Sunday, April 26, 2020

Notes on E&M

Notes on E&M

Definitions

E⃗=F⃗q\vec E = \frac{\vec F}{q}
ϕE=∫E⃗⋅dA⃗\phi_E = \int \vec E \cdot d\vec A
ϕB=∫B⃗⋅dl⃗\phi_B = \int \vec B \cdot d\vec l
ε=∮LF⃗on charge qq⋅dl⃗\varepsilon = \oint_{L} \frac{\vec F_{on \, charge \, q}}{q} \cdot d\vec l
ΔV=−∫ABE⃗⋅dl⃗\Delta V = -\int^B_A \vec E \cdot d\vec l    if ∮LE⃗⋅dl⃗=0\oint_L\vec E \cdot d\vec l= 0      E⃗\vec E created by charges

Maxwell’s Equations

Gauss’s Law

∮E⃗⋅dA⃗=qenclosedε0\oint \vec E \cdot d \vec A = \frac{q_{enclosed}}{\varepsilon_0}     → charges make E⃗\vec E, which is path-independent
∮B⃗⋅dA⃗=0\oint \vec B \cdot d \vec A = 0    → there is no magnetic monopole

Ampere’s Law

∮B⃗⋅dl⃗=μ0I+μ0ε0dϕEdt\oint \vec B \cdot d \vec l = \mu_0I + \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{d\phi_E}{dt}    → current and changing electric fulx make B⃗\vec B

Faraday’s Law

ε=−dϕBdt\varepsilon=-\frac{d\phi_B}{dt}    → changing magnetic flux makes emf

EMF

ε=∮LoopF⃗on charge qq⋅dl⃗\varepsilon = \oint_{Loop} \frac{\vec F_{on \, charge \, q}}{q} \cdot d\vec l
If F⃗on charge q\vec F_{on \, charge \, q} comes from:

  1. B⃗\vec B, then
    it is a motional emf

    e.g.
    A rectangular conductor with length L is moving in a uniform magnetic field, then charges on the conductor would separate by magnetic for and creates a electric field inside the conductor. The charges would keep separating until ∣FE∣=∣FB∣|F_E|=|F_B|
    FE=FBF_E=F_B
    qE=qvBqE=qvB
    ∴E=vB\therefore E=vB
    So, by ΔV=−∫ABE⃗⋅dl⃗\Delta V = -\int^B_A \vec E \cdot d\vec l,
    Get ΔV=vBL\Delta V =vBL

  2. E⃗\vec E, then
    it is a tranformer emf
    In which ∮LE⃗⋅dl⃗≠0\oint_L\vec E \cdot d\vec l \neq 0, so by the Faraday’s Law,
    ∮LE⃗⋅dl⃗=−ddt(∫B⃗⋅dA⃗)\oint_L\vec E \cdot d\vec l = -\frac{d}{dt}(\int\vec B \cdot d\vec A) changing B⃗\vec B makes E⃗\vec E (i.e. changing B⃗\vec B induces I).
    E⃗\vec E here depends on path

Yet it seems that these two types of emf are different phenomena, both of them could be concluded by Faraday’s Law (i.e. changing magnetic flux)

Why E⃗\vec E created by charges guarantees ∮LE⃗⋅dl⃗=0\oint_L\vec E \cdot d\vec l= 0

Loop ABCD as Loop L
path A to B: E⃗∥dl⃗\vec E \parallel d\vec l   so, we have ∫ABkq/r2dl\int^B_A kq/r^2dl on path A to B
with the same logic, we have ∫ABkq/r2(−dl)\int^B_A kq/r^2(-dl) on path C to D
On path B to C and path D to A, since E⃗⊥dl⃗\vec E \bot d\vec l , integrations on those two path would be zero.
So, ∮LE⃗⋅dl⃗=∫ABkq/r2dl+∫ABkq/r2(−dl)=0\oint_L\vec E \cdot d\vec l= \int^B_A kq/r^2dl + \int^B_A kq/r^2(-dl) = 0

By contrast, for E⃗\vec E created by changing B⃗\vec B,
since E⃗∥dl⃗\vec E \parallel d\vec l,
∮LE⃗⋅dl⃗≠0\oint_L\vec E \cdot d\vec l \neq 0

No comments:

Post a Comment

Installing xAct (Mac)

Download from http : www.xact.es . Before unpack the tar/tgz file, remove attributes with xattr -c xAct_1.x.x.tgz then place the un...