E=qF ϕE=∫E⋅dA ϕB=∫B⋅dl ε=∮LqFonchargeq⋅dl ΔV=−∫ABE⋅dl if ∮LE⋅dl=0E created by charges
Maxwell’s Equations
Gauss’s Law
∮E⋅dA=ε0qenclosed → charges make E, which is path-independent ∮B⋅dA=0 → there is no magnetic monopole
Ampere’s Law
∮B⋅dl=μ0I+μ0ε0dtdϕE → current and changing electric fulx make B
Faraday’s Law
ε=−dtdϕB → changing magnetic flux makes emf
EMF
ε=∮LoopqFonchargeq⋅dl
If Fonchargeq comes from:
B, then
it is a motional emf
e.g.
A rectangular conductor with length L is moving in a uniform magnetic field, then charges on the conductor would separate by magnetic for and creates a electric field inside the conductor. The charges would keep separating until ∣FE∣=∣FB∣ FE=FB qE=qvB ∴E=vB
So, by ΔV=−∫ABE⋅dl,
Get ΔV=vBL
E, then
it is a tranformer emf
In which ∮LE⋅dl=0, so by the Faraday’s Law, ∮LE⋅dl=−dtd(∫B⋅dA) changing B makes E (i.e. changing B induces I). Ehere depends on path
Yet it seems that these two types of emf are different phenomena, both of them could be concluded by Faraday’s Law (i.e. changing magnetic flux)
Why E created by charges guarantees ∮LE⋅dl=0
path A to B: E∥dl so, we have ∫ABkq/r2dl on path A to B
with the same logic, we have ∫ABkq/r2(−dl) on path C to D
On path B to C and path D to A, since E⊥dl , integrations on those two path would be zero.
So, ∮LE⋅dl=∫ABkq/r2dl+∫ABkq/r2(−dl)=0
By contrast, for E created by changing B,
since E∥dl, ∮LE⋅dl=0